Reinforced CLP enforcement in 2026: a strong signal for economic operators

As the EU prepares for a new wave of inspections in 2026, economic operators will need to be more vigilant than ever: the ECHA has announced a major coordinated action to verify the classification, labelling and packaging of hazardous mixtures. This initiative, part of the REF‑14 project, reinforces the central role of the CLP Regulation in placing chemical and consumer products on the market, signalling heightened regulatory expectations across the entire supply chain.

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has announced the launch, in 2026, of a coordinated enforcement action at EU level focusing on the classification, labelling and packaging of hazardous mixtures, as part of the REF-14 project. This initiative forms part of the European programme aimed at strengthening the enforcement of chemicals legislation and confirms the central role of the CLP Regulation in the placing on the market of chemicals and consumer products.

The scope of these inspections will focus on hazardous mixtures incorporated into finished products that are widely available to consumers. Particular attention will be paid to products known to contain substances or mixtures presenting risks to human health or the environment, such as certain nicotine-containing products, aerosols or air fresheners. Enforcement authorities will assess the correctness of classifications, the consistency of labelling and the adequacy of packaging, notably in light of the requirements intended to protect end users.

The CLP Regulation is based on a core principle whereby responsibility for classification lies with the supplier placing the substance or mixture on the market. This classification forms the basis of all downstream regulatory obligations, including labelling requirements, the content of safety data sheets and information duties throughout the supply chain. In practice, inspections frequently reveal classifications that have become outdated following regulatory or scientific developments, errors in the assessment of mixture hazards, or inconsistencies between the chosen classification and the associated regulatory documentation.

The REF-14 action is not limited to a purely formal assessment of compliance with the CLP Regulation. ECHA has indicated that national enforcement authorities may also verify compliance with restrictions laid down under the REACH Regulation, as well as with requirements arising from the Regulation on persistent organic pollutants. This cross-cutting approach significantly broadens the scope of inspections and increases legal risk for operators whose products present regulatory weaknesses, including where such weaknesses are not immediately apparent from labelling alone.

The consequences of non-compliance identified during an inspection may be substantial. They may include orders to bring products into compliance, product withdrawals or recalls, administrative or criminal penalties under applicable national laws, as well as logistical or customs disruptions and reputational harm for the companies concerned. In this context, CLP classification should not be viewed as an isolated formal obligation, but rather as a structuring element of compliance strategies and regulatory risk management.

Although the REF-14 campaign is scheduled for 2026, its announcement encourages economic operators to anticipate these inspections at an early stage. A critical review of existing classifications, verification of consistency between classification, labelling and safety data sheets, and assessment of the impact of recent regulatory developments are key measures to secure market access for products. This coordinated action once again highlights the central role of chemicals legislation in regulating the internal market and the heightened responsibility borne by economic operators.

Keladis cases: the CJEU firmly restricts the use of EU statistical data in customs valuation

In the Keladis cases, the CJEU strictly circumscribes the use of “acceptable minimum prices” derived from European statistical databases, notably those disseminated by the European Anti-Fraud Office. It recalls that such data can never, on their own, displace the transaction value and may be relied upon only as a measure of last resort, in compliance with the hierarchy of valuation methods and subject to strict safeguards.

US tariffs: key takeaways following the US Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court’s decision of 20 February 2026 reshapes the US tariff framework by striking down duties imposed under the IEEPA. To maintain commercial pressure, the Trump administration immediately activates Section 122 and introduces a universal 10% import surcharge.

Beyond the ban on sanctions circumvention: an additional due diligence obligation

The forthcoming adoption of the 20th package of sanctions against Russia raises questions not only about the legislative arsenal but also about the increasingly structured enforcement capabilities of national authorities. The broadened definition of circumvention requires companies to exercise greater rigour so they can consistently demonstrate that they have actively sought to avoid indirectly participating in a prohibited transaction.