New French Customs Code: What has changed for operators since 1 May 2026 ?

Entered into force on 1 May 2026, the new French Customs Code substantially modernises the presentation of French customs law. Although the reform was carried out without altering the substance of the law, it has immediate practical consequences for operators, who must now become familiar with a new structure and a new numbering system for the applicable provisions.

By Order No. 2026-265 of 8 April 2026, adopted on the basis of Article 36 of Law No. 2023-610 of 18 July 2023 aimed at providing the customs administration with tools adapted to new economic, financial and security threats, the new French Customs Code entered into force on 1 May 2026.

This reform constitutes the first comprehensive recodification of French customs law since 1948. It brings about a significant transformation of the structure of the Code, which now comprises 1,413 articles, compared with 498 in its previous version. Adopted before the major developments in European customs law, from the customs union to the Union Customs Code, the former Code had gradually become less readable for both operators and the administration.

In substance, the recodification was carried out without altering the existing law. It is therefore not intended to substantially modify the rules applicable to operators, controls, litigation procedures or sanctions. However, it thoroughly reorganises the existing provisions in order to improve their coherence, readability and accessibility.

The new Code notably incorporates:

  • Procedural rules relating to indirect taxes;
  • Specific provisions applicable to overseas collectivities.

This new architecture is intended to facilitate the identification of the applicable rules according to the nature of the procedures, offences or territories concerned. The Code is now structured around seven thematic books, covering in particular general principles, the customs treatment of goods, recovery, control powers, sanctions, procedures following controls, and provisions specific to overseas territories.

The main practical consequence lies in the complete overhaul of the numbering of the articles in the legislative part. The references commonly used by operators, advisers, freight forwarders and customs litigation practitioners have therefore been profoundly modified.

The codification of the regulatory provisions also constitutes a major innovation. Until now, these provisions were scattered across various implementing texts. Their integration into a single codified body strengthens normative accessibility and legal certainty.

In this respect, the reform is not limited to the legislative part alone: it is also accompanied by the creation of a regulatory part and an “Orders” part of the Customs Code. A concordance table between the former and the new provisions has also been published in order to allow users to identify more easily the new applicable references.

Sample of some of the most commonly used provisions:

 Former codeNew code – Legislative PartNew code – Regulatory Part
Right to be heardArticles 67 A to 67 DArticles L.311-1 to L.311-9/
Challenge to recovery noticesArticles 345 and 346Articles L.323-6 and L.331-1Articles R.323-2 to D.323-3
Right of inspectionArticles 60 to 60-10Article L.422-1 to L. 422-16/
Right of communicationArticles 64 A to 65 quinquiesArticles L.421-1 to L.421-13Articles R.421-1 to R.421-3
Classification of offences and sanctionsArticles 408 to 429Articles L.511-1 to L.511-6 Articles L.513-1 to L.513-23 (criminal offences)  Articles R.511-1 to R.515-9

For operators, this reform therefore mainly entails the need to update internal references: standard letters, control procedures, claims, litigation submissions, power of attorney, training materials, document databases and compliance tools will have to be adapted to the new numbering system. In this respect, the concordance table[1] published together with the recodification texts constitutes an essential transitional tool.

In practice, the new French Customs Code does not alter the fundamental relationship with Union law. It remains distinct from the Union Customs Code, which contains the body of European customs rules.

As a reminder, following the failure of the proposed Directive COM(2013) 884 of 13 December 2013, which sought to establish a harmonized Union framework for customs infringements and sanctions but ultimately did not succeed, one of the essential components of the French Customs Code remains, and continues to be, its enforcement and sanctions dimension.


[1] https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/contenu/menu/autour-de-la-loi/codification/tables-de-concordance/code-des-douanes

New French Customs Code: What has changed for operators since 1 May 2026 ?

Entered into force on 1 May 2026, the new French Customs Code substantially modernises the presentation of French customs law. Although the reform was carried out without altering the substance of the law, it has immediate practical consequences for operators, who must now become familiar with a new structure and a new numbering system for the applicable provisions.

Reform of EU trade defence instruments: five Member States advocate a paradigm shift

In response to rising unfair trade practices and global overcapacity, five EU Member States are calling for a significant strengthening of the Union’s trade defence instruments. Their proposals signal a shift in paradigm towards a more reactive, strategic and protective approach to safeguarding European industry.

An important extension on U.S. Cuba-related sanctions program for non-U.S. actors

The Presidential Executive Order of 1 May 2026 marks a significant development in the United States’ sanctions policy towards Cuba. By introducing, for the first time within this framework, a genuine mechanism of secondary sanctions targeting foreign actors, Executive Order 14404 considerably expands the extraterritorial reach of the regime. Non-U.S. companies and financial institutions are now directly exposed to asset-freezing measures for activities connected to the Cuban economy, thereby increasing the legal and operational risks associated with any engagement with the island.